• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      That is definitely one of the most cooked takes I’ve heard in a while.

      Why would anyone create anything if it can immediately be copied with no compensation to you?

      • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I don’t see how allowing AI robbery barons to steal copyrighted material would benefit a small fish in the pond of IP

      • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Creation happened before intellectual property laws existed.

        Creation happens that can be immediately copied with no compensation now, open source software is an example.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          How many authors do you think would have written the books they did, if they weren’t able to make a living from their work? Most of the people creating works before copyright either had a patron of some description, or outright worked for an organisation.

          • bufalo1973@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            You should read the opinion of Stephen King about that precise point. The short version: “I’d write books even if it was illegal”.

          • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            The specific works? Who knows. It’s irrelevant

            My point is your original premise was wrong. Creation DID happen without IP laws. People DO create with out the need for compensation/copy protection.

            I propose, people will create things because they always have.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think copyright should last maximum 10 years. Plenty of time to earn enough from your creation.

        Imagine how advanced we would be, as a civilization, if everything created before 2015 was free for everybody.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          Honestly, I think our world would be a lot blander, and we’d have a whole lot less original content.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You know that for the vast majority of human history copyright didn’t exist, and yet people still created art and culture, right?

        edit: If you’re gonna downvote, have the balls to explain how I’m wrong.

      • Aux@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The original copyright law was created to protect authors from publishers. The current law is an abomination and should be removed.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re probably right, but saying we should abolish it altogether is insane. There’s a good reason we have these laws.