• FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    “To address the issue of unauthorized screen captures during meetings, the Prevent Screen Capture feature ensures that if a user attempts to take a screen capture, the meeting window will turn black, thereby protecting sensitive information,” Microsoft shared in a new Microsoft 365 roadmap entry.

    “This feature will be available on Teams desktop applications (both Windows and Mac) and Teams mobile applications (both iOS and Android).”

    Yeah, seems like a perfectly reasonable feature to add. It will also likely be a toggle-able feature switch.

    Surely there’s no way Lemmy gets angry at this, right?

    Reads comments

    • JordanZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The feature is fine in theory. In practice, especially with work from home, it’s useless to achieve the goal it set out to. The article even points it out.

      However, it should be noted that, even if screenshots are blocked, sensitive media and information shared in Teams meetings can still be captured by taking a photo of the conversation.

      Taking photos of screens makes a crappy photo but it’s still a photo of whatever they didn’t want you to take a screenshot of. It’s actually probably worse because now that sensitive info likely isn’t even on a company controlled device anymore and might be uploaded to iCloud or Google automatically because of it.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The feature is fine in theory. In practice, especially with work from home, it’s useless to achieve the goal it set out to. The article even points it out.

        While true, that doesn’t really matter when it comes to enterprise. For security compliance you have to be shown to be doing everything that you can to prevent security breaches etc. This feature is another tick box that you can show to whoever is doing your audits to show that you are doing it.

        Also most people don’t sit there in meetings with their finger on the screenshot key ready to go - but it is simple to just press a screenshot key on your keyboard. It’s a little bit harder to have your phone up and with the camera open the entire time ready to take photos, especially if cameras are on - especially if something just pops up briefly on screen and you realise you want to capture it.

        I don’t know your experience in enterprise, but I can tell you that a feature like this will be much applauded by those running companies for the reasons above.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yeah, this is a “feature” for the companies with the “enterprise” warning label who would rather waste a lot of effort on ineffective compliance checklists than actually make sure their software is up-to-date with security fixes.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Nope. Compliance check lists matter when you are audited by external companies for things like PCI. It’s also not a lot of effort, nor is it ineffective, nor is making sure software is up to date ignored.

    • Jayb151@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I mean… Would it do the same with a 3rd party screenshot app? Or even something like obs? So many ways around it, no reason to get too upset.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      My problem with it is that it gives a sense of security that does not exist.

      Non-Technical folk will click the button and think they’re safe

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        My problem with it is that it gives a sense of security that does not exist.

        It gives security for 99% of people that will ever be on the calls, and most importantly it gives the company something to point to whenever they get security audits.

        Non-Technical folk will click the button and think they’re safe

        Non-technical folk aren’t usually responsible for setting policies in enterprise software lol. They won’t have an option.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Especially in the companies with the enterprise warning label non-technical idiots are in charge of setting technical policies because it is all about office politics there.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            If a company on enterprise plans has non-IT technical people doing their technical policies then nothing will save them.

    • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I really want to dump on them but I can’t find anything wrong with the feature… That’s depressing, I’ll have to look elsewhere for my dose of “MS can’t do anything right lol”

        • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Sure, but it takes extra steps and the results won’t be as good as direct screen capture. It won’t stop someone determined, but it’s annoying enough that most people won’t bother.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Bit more effort and harder to do when something only briefly flashes on screen than it is to hit the screenshot button on almost every keyboard.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              As I said in another comment:

              Also most people don’t sit there in meetings with their finger on the screenshot key ready to go - but it is simple to just press a screenshot key on your keyboard. It’s a little bit harder to have your phone up and with the camera open the entire time ready to take photos, especially if cameras are on - especially if something just pops up briefly on screen and you realise you want to capture it.

              This is only going to keep honest people honest.

              It’s going to keep the overwhelming amount of people “honest”, and it’s going to give companies an extra tick box on any security audits that are integral to the company doing business.