• PhAzE@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Eh, tbh it still does the core basics of streaming my content and Metadata management, so I don’t really care about enshitification of ‘extra’ features that I never use. It’s still the easiest way to share media

      • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yes, because the core mechanics of their platform is media metadata management and streaming. As long as those work, and my users don’t have to pay anything (because I have a plex pass lifetime already), then it has no effect on me or my users.

        All that extra stuff can just be turned off.

          • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            Not quite. Only if users want to stream from a server that doesn’t have a plex pass, in which case the user needs a plex watch pass.

            If you (the server owner) have a plex pass, all users (even free accounts) can stream from you without a pass.

            If you (the server owner) do not have a plex pass, then the users need a plex watch pass to stream from you.

            Essentially, they’re making sure one side or the other has paid, but free to free is being stopped.

            Local stream isn’t affected by this either, only remote streaming. As someone who has had plexpass for 12 plus years, it doesn’t affect me or my users.

            • MBech@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              And lets be real here for a second. It costs actual money to develop and update Plex. All these people being butthurt about no longer being able to watch everything for free are entitled as fuck. It’s okay to pay developers for their time and expertise. A carpenter expects you to pay them. A painter also expects you to pay them. A software engineer expects to be paid for their work, and they won’t if people use their software for free. If you don’t want to pay for it, download your own shit, and if you’re hosting for a lot of users, tell all the users to download their own shit.

              • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 minutes ago

                Yep. But it gets called enshitification, yet the platform still scrapes Metadata reliably, still streams to any client reliably, and is still easy to share with friends and family wothout having to manage ip addresses or ddns. To me, the ‘enshitifcation’ people are complaining about is literally not wanting to support devs for a product that does what you need, well.