Greg Kroah-Hartman… urged fellow contributors to embrace those interested in contributing Rust code to improve the kernel.

"Adding another language really shouldn’t be a problem… embrace the people offering to join us

Thoughts on this?

  • farcaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Moving from C to C++ would also not solve any real problem. C++ of course adds OOP which I think can be nice (not everyone agrees with this!) but it also adds an insane amount of language complexity and instability. Mentally reasoning about C code is hard, reasoning about C++ code is nearly impossible.

    Rust however brings a novel solution to classes of problems like ownership and mutability with the borrow checker. It’s now accepted to be a great tool for writing high performance code while preventing a substantial amount of common, but often subtle, bugs from slipping through. It’s not arbitrarily the first non-C code to be accepted in the kernel. And it’s used in other operating systems like Android and Windows already.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      In general, for me, Rust > C > C++.

      I’ve heard people say that C is like a loaded and cocked revolver, and if you’re not careful, you could blow your foot off, whereas C++ is like a loaded and cocked sawed-off shotgun, and if you’re not careful, you could blow your leg off.

        • gedhrel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Whilst it’s gotten a lot better in the -17 and -20 iterations, the fact that there was recently a doorstop book published solely on the subject of C++ initialisation semantics is pretty telling.

          I really like what Herb Sutter’s doing around cppfront; I still wouldn’t use C++ unless I absolutely had to.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Mostly this ^.

      There’s just not really demand for C++ in the kernel; that’s not the case with Rust.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      I think rust would also bring in more developers. So more changes would eventually make its way into the kernel.