Ah thanks for the first proper answer. Sounds good, I will give it a try.

So it is better because it can do more, but I assume not too too much? Because then we can also use word?

Notepad does that neither for me and has not for >20 years. So is there something that is actually better or not?

Is it though? I still always open notepad for random text stuff. What is better in ++?

What benefits and rights are that supposed to be?

Any reasonable person knew that? What…?

I love how you mix in the Idiocracy quotes :D

Wrong thread?

“If you try hard you might find arguments for my side”

What kind of meta-argument is that supposed to be?

So the ads are the problem? Do you have a link to such an ad?

So many arguments… Wow!

“I can calculate powers with decimal values in the exponent and if you can not do that on paper but instead use these machines, your calculations are worthless and you are not an engineer”

You seem to fail to see that this new tool has unique strengths. As the other guy said, it is just like people ranting about Wikipedia. Absurd.

You know what… now that you say it, it really is just like the anti-Wikipedia stuff.

What? No. Instead we would be able to see steady increases of say 10 % per year as a straight line instead of this, where it appears to be ever larger increases and the first ones essentially invisible.

How could I blindly trust anything in this context?

Why is the graph not logarithmic? Urgh

This is really a non-issue, as the LLM itself should have no problem at setting a reasonable value itself. User wants a summary? Obviously maximum factual. He wants gaming ideas? Etc.

Rare that people here argument for LLMs like that here, usually it is the same kind of “uga suga, AI bad, did not already solve world hunger”.

Especially after the open source release of DeepSeak… What…?

Nonsense, I use it a ton for science and engineering, it saves me SO much time!