Why not both?
Why not both?
I assert it’s also immoral, especially in modern times.
That sounds vaguely like The Peter Principal.
And in turn, breeds more psychopathy. I’m fairly convinced psychopathy is, at least partly, explained by epigenetics.
Google’s parent is the alphabet Corp, who started with funding from, and working for the US alphabet agencies.
3-5% of the population general striking and protesting wildly could turn the tide. People say they can’t afford time off work. They won’t have work, if they don’t. At least not paid work.
Maybe it’s more sinister than that.
Maybe it’s intentional
Can you not grasp the larger implications?
Google is an alphabet agency company. You’re not wrong, but they do, have and are handing that information over to governments, including the current US administration.
I never saw it but read it. Yes, 10/10, highly recommend.
Bradbury called it in Farahenheit 451.
But the reason for stripping them of their wealth is that they’re dangerous, we don’t give nukes to violent schizophrenics.
This is being very vividly illustrated, irl.
Hoarding that much excess wealth induces mental disorders.
I was wondering if epigenetics may speak to that, in some cases
The only solution is to redistribute their wealth.
For the rest of us. I’m curious if it addresses the sociopathic tendencies of the original wealth hoarder?
ETA: that was a quick search for that study and I certainly don’t understand it well.
May every business that brings this man profit tank until he learns some empathy.
Maybe, I’ll reread, I’ve something to do shortly that will take most of my day but I’ll come back tonight to this. Thank you
And people discussing it are employed by musk?
Are you excusing it?
GitHub is owned by Microsoft.
Stock market was a bookie for rich people. I think you meant 401k.