Printing new editions of a book was always a thing

I never used T9 because of that. It never knew what I want to say.

You need to adjust your patterns to it, but when you do, oh boy is it convenient. I still can type on it blindly almost as quick as I do with full desktop keyboard, and I’m pretty quick with that

It’s better if the titular Steve isn’t from US. Right now at least.

You are being unnecessarily pedantic. “A person can be wrong therefore I will get my information from a random words generator” is exactly the attitude we need to avoid.
A teacher can be mistaken, yes. But when they start lying on purpose, they stop being a teacher. When they don’t know the difference between the truth and a lie, they never were.

No, obviously not. You don’t actually learn if you get misinformation, it’s actually the opposite of learning.
But thankfully you don’t have to chose between those two options.

There are industrial uses for it, so it doesn’t have to be stored forever.

The problem is, spilling water on the floor is how the richest entities in the world keep their power, so that’s kind of out of the question. I don’t see a way to overthrow all the oil money. So either we sit there and hurumpf that the world is shit and unfair, or do something to make it ever so slightly better.

And how does adding an extension to Google Chrome that visually changes one word on Google Maps suppose to help with that?

People generally don’t learn from an unreliable teacher.

There is a wast difference between Google glasses and hololens.
The industrial application that I was using it worked as a concept, and I mean worked in reality, not what you are talking about. I used it, and it did saved me time and labour, even in that preliminary stage. I don’t know would it work on a larger scale, but that three devices that the whole factory floor had access to were in use the whole time, and in a conservative industry it’s saying something.

If you read what people write, you will understand what they’re trying to tell you. Shocking concept, I know. It’s much easier to imagine someone in your head, paint him as a soyjack and yourself as a chadjack and epicly win an argument.

I don’t know about military, but there was a number of successful applications of hololens in the industrial environment. It never went anywhere where I saw it, because the device was too expensive, too experimental, and it was impossible to purchase, but the ideas were ok.

Ask a forest burning machine to read the surrounding treads for you, then you will find the arguments you’re looking for. You have at least 80% chance it will produce something coherent, and unknown chance of there being something correct, but hey, reading is hard amirite?

What a nuanced representation of the position, I just feel trustworthiness oozes out of the screen.
In case you’re using random words generation machine to summarise this comment for you, it was a sarcasm, and I meant the opposite.

In which case you probably aren’t saving time. Checking bullshit is usually harder and longer to just research shit yourself. Or should be, if you do due diligence

It’s easy, it’s quick, and it’s free: pouring river water in your socks.
Fortunately, there are other possible criteria.

Exactly. In a sence that it happened once, wasn’t really significant, but people making it out to be some kind of catastrophe instead of a pretty regular not very newsworthy event

Off hours can’t be 6 times cheaper, surely

fucking propaganda

Damn, really? That’s craaaazy.