data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/804d8/804d8c632fa14eb5d8b0e27ccc01e491594bf24b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df69/1df69f53f5559e83c288e08b403109544e78dc05" alt=""
2·
17 days agoSeven figures? Try nine. Musk spent an absolutely staggering amount getting Trump elected.
Seven figures? Try nine. Musk spent an absolutely staggering amount getting Trump elected.
What gets measured gets improved. The inverse is also true - what doesn’t get (or can’t be) measured deteriorates.
Google had a uniquely employee-friendly culture and probably the highest morale amongst the FAANG companies. But Sundar apparently couldn’t assign a value to that like he could quarterly balance sheet improvements, and at some point it appears to have disappeared from his decision tree entirely.
So it’s no surprise they discarded their entire company culture and are so concerned with the same Wall Street-pleasing nonsense efficiency metrics as a typical company. Google is no longer special in any way.
I get that it’s usually just a dunk on AI, but it is also still a valid demonstration that AI has pretty severe and unpredictable gaps in functionality, in addition to failing to properly indicate confidence (or lack thereof).
People who understand that it’s a glorified autocomplete will know how to disregard or prompt around some of these gaps, but this remains a litmus test because it succinctly shows you cannot trust an LLM response even in many “easy” cases.