Hard agree in every point

Sounds scary. I read a story the other day about a dude who really got himself a discord server with chatbots, and that was his main place of “communicating” and “socializing”

Redditor as “a person active on Reddit”? I don’t see where I was talking about humans. Or am I misunderstanding the question?

It doesn’t, who the hell cares if someone allowed it to break “predict whole text” into "predict part by part, and then “with rhyme, we start at the end”. Sounds like a naive (not as in “simplistic”, but as “most straightforward”) way to code this, so given the task to write an automatic poetry producer, I would start with something similar. The whole thing still stands as fancy auto-complete

Lol. Be my guest and knock yourself out, dreaming you know things

I’ll bait. Let’s think:

-there are three humans who are 98% right about what they say, and where they know they might be wrong, they indicate it

• now there is an llm (fuck capitalization, I hate the ways they are shoved everywhere that much) trained on their output

• now llm is asked about the topic and computes the answer string

By definition that answer string can contain all the probably-wrong things without proper indicators (“might”, “under such and such circumstances” etc)

If you want to say 40% wrong llm means 40% wrong sources, prove me wrong

I have a new word for you: information

National security my ass. More like his time span to show more dumb “achievements” while getting richer depends on it and nothing else

Time to turn inside. Whatever around you gets fucked, essentially no one can order you “be miserable”. If this one thing gets fixed a hundred percent your way, the rest is just a question of what you can do and how much of that you are willing to do

But does it seem a very long road to become fully in control of own interiority.

I did not come up with this on my own, just picked if up from someone else, but can’t argue with it