Disabling JavaScript entirely is another data point for fingerprinting. Only a tiny fraction of users do it.
Besides, without JavaScript most websites are not functional anymore. Those that are are likely not tracking you much in the first place.
How do you prove they’re doing it?
How would that even be enforced?
Convenience. Most people reads book once, if they finish it at all.
Why don’t you use library genesis or Anna‘s archive?
Driving a cyber truck is sure to get you some attention. That’s valuable to some people.
It has a bold futuristic exterior design and looks.
A more fractured internet is coming. Posting sources will be forbidden. Discourse will become more polarized, disconnected, and extreme.
Most of these Reddit bans on Twitter are also half assed. They still allow screenshots of Twitter posts. That means the content is still spread, and Twitter remains relevant.
Lots of these subreddits don’t even get a lot of Twitter links in the first place. Like for lotrmemes it makes zero difference.
That said, Musk and Twitter suck. I have deleted my Twitter account three years ago.
However there still is some information, where Twitter is a good source.
Wouldn’t selective disabling of JavaScript make fingerprinting easier? Your block and white list are likely to be unique.