copyright is immoral

they might claim they’re harmed if the information is distributed for free. I don’t care. that’s not theft.

since the defendant is also a capitalist firm, I can see the similarities, but if someone were to simply be liberating the information, I don’t see that as stealing.

stealing others’ work

Reuters still has their analysis. nothing was stolen.

Whether you support IP or not, the AI company is clearly in the wrong here.

they’re both wrong to restrict access. if legal analysis is necessary to understand the law, then restricting access to that analysis, or it’s free dissemination, is also wrong.

I don’t trust that judge’s ability to determine whether they were copied if it wasn’t verbatim. which is what copyright is. to control an idea, you need a patent.

tragic. no one should need to pay to read the law

right. I just thought they’d made the news today or something.

what did PayPal do?

everything is political. you are advocating that these institutions pretend observer bias doesn’t exist.