I can read his tweet. It makes absolutely no sense as his words are the literal opposite of what is really happening right in front of everyone’s eyes. The only explanation is he is sucking up to the party that is dismantling our democracy for his own financial gain.

Do enlighten us all.

But why support the Nazi sympathizer?

So are the social consequences of speech.

Legality has never been morality. Slavery was legal, still technically is.

Because in the kindle store you’re not purchasing the book but a license to the book.

There’s a difference between blanket firing all probationary employees and putting specific names of people working on regulating his businesses on a list to fire.

If you can’t make that distinction in a discussion of how this is bad, then you are going to be dismissed as biased and making false representations.

There’s plenty of dirt being done without having to make shit up to make it sound worse. The truth matters. People who don’t care about the truth got us into this mess and they certainly aren’t going to get us out of it.

The have all the morale, non of the morals.

Gizmodo is a trash source, they are telling you what you want to hear.

These people were collateral from their scatter shot mass firing of all probationary employees. Breaking the agencies that regulate his businesses is the goal, but they aren’t specifically targeting employees who are regulating his products.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fda-staff-reviewing-musks-neuralink-were-included-doge-employee-firings-sources-2025-02-17/

You know the first people they fired were all the inspector generals right? Those are the watch dogs who investigate where the money is going and watch out for people breaking the law. And they illegally fired the head of the office that protects government whistleblowers. He’s currently counting on the Supreme Court to uphold the law.

I regret that I have but one upvote to give.

This is absurd. Not because of your personal preferences but because you are so naive and narrow minded as to be incapable of imagining another viewpoint. This thinking is why the world is falling apart.

100% yes on Nook, and as far as I know Kobo hasn’t dropped compatibility.

Kobo and Nook ebooks are still ePUB and easy enough to free from their DRM.

Adding on to this that Barnes and Noble sells DRMed ePUB files that are relatively easy to strip DRM from using Calibre.

So if you can’t find a book anywhere else, at least they don’t use a proprietary format and still allow you to download your books using their PC software.

I was a semi-early adopter in the ebook space and I have refused to get onboard with the kindle ecosystem from the start. There’s no reason for their proprietary format other than complete control over things they pretend to sell you. Amazon is also the Walmart of books and uses their position to browbeat publishers and authors into taking smaller cuts of sales.

One of my friends got a book published and I waited and waited for it to be available anywhere else. Eventually just bought what was probably a print on demand copy from Amazon because that’s the only place his publisher sold books. I never buy physical books anymore but I’d rather do that than buy a kindle book.

You have to enable each service on Android TV. Most streaming services are on there.

They pulled that same shit on Android as well. But I think they are integrated back in on the current generation of it.

Ahh, so this must be on apple devices only.

Doesn’t Apple do the same thing as Prime video where you can add other subscriptions through their app? Seems like this is a mistake on Apple’s part while testing this feature for Netflix.

While I appreciate the effort, I’m not sure the technology section here is the appropriate place to post your school essay.