I’ll take “things that might have happened if Elon didn’t cut the department that relates self-driving” for $100, Alex.

In my experience, LLMs are good for code snippets and input on best practices.

I use it as a tool to speed up my work, but I don’t see it replacing even entry jobs any time soon.

True, I should have said a benefit that is a negative for the consumer.

You’re getting down-voted, but, yes, this change only really affects user experience.

I don’t know why anyone would think that what the LLM can access for context during your session is a limiting factor for what OpenAI has access to.

If this change freaks you out, the time for you to be freaked out about history was the moment they started storing it.

I think you might be confused about the difference between giving the LLM access to your stored conversations during your session and using OpenAI using AI to search your stored conversations.

What the LLM has access to during your session changes nothing but your session.

It’s not some “I, Robot” central AI that either has access or doesn’t as a whole.

That is the difference, but it’s a pretty minimal difference. Open AI hardly needs to give the LLM access to your conversations during your session to access your conversations.

In fact, I don’t see any direct benefit to OpenAI with this change. All it does is (probably) improve its answers to the user during a session.

I’m not going to defend OpenAI in general, but that difference is meaningless outside of how the LLM interacts with you.

If data privacy is your focus, it doesn’t matter that the LLM has access to it during your session to modify how it reacts to you. They don’t need the LLM at all to use that history.

This isn’t an “I’m out” type of change for privacy. If it is, you missed your stop when they started keeping a history.

You mean DE1, right?

Mint for general use.

Nobara or PopOS for gaming.

Edit - you know what’s dumb about silent down votes? If you have an opinion, share it.

Love your edit. Sounds like me, lol.

I’ve heard people like that one. I didn’t try it, but I love Nobara as my primary OS.

It’s so cool. We’ve been waiting for Linux to cover gaming and it really has with the push from Steam.

Personally, I’ve never had trouble even with partitions, but Windows isn’t going to mess with drives that aren’t NTFS.

Good stuff. Too many people lately are all “no copyright would be an improvement.” Yeah, maybe for the corps who could freely use your output as they wish.

Nobara or Pop! OS would be good choices.

Yeah, VR is still catching up, but I feel like (dual) booting to Win 10 just for specific purposes would greatly reduce the risk.

You seem very convinced, considering the downvotes of discussion.

Edit - lol, like I said.

So… out of date stats about advertising?

If that were true, removing copyright entirely would benefit society.

Just because it’s been corrupted doesn’t mean the intent and purpose isn’t still there.

It’s absurd that we essentially agree on what needs to happen, but you’re stuck on the idea copyright currently has no benefit to anyone but big business.

Seems like a strange application of stats when, as you say, the regulated safety features - the important ones - need not come into a decision-making process and advertising them would be a waste of time.

Bahaha, what kind of a bizarre statement is that?

Was he trying to imply the government only uses spreadsheets and nosql DBs?

Or did he think it was necessary to point out that your average government employee isn’t writing their own SQL to grab data they need?