• 4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Correct. Everyone knows this trick so everyone filters out the everything from the + to the @.

    Even when email lists are “legitimately” sold it’s removed.

    This guy’s using 1990s techniques in 2025.

    “We can prosecute using IP address!”

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Ah, it’s more about the receiver than the sender. If they cut it off, their letter gets deleted or moves to spam directory. Provided someone configures that.

      With centralized mail services of today 1990s’ techniques don’t work so well, but that’s a problem of adoption, not allowing mail without a correct token is still pretty modern.

    • exasperation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The use of a “+” convention is just a convention popularized by Gmail and the other major providers. If you have your own domain, you should be able to do this with any arbitrary text schema, and encode some information in the address itself, especially if you don’t care about sending email from those aliases: set up your email service to have a catchall inbox that can further be filtered/forwarded based on other rules.

      It can be cumbersome but I could see it working at getting the information you’re looking for.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah, I love my catch-all email domain. If I start getting spam addressed to “Target@{my domain}” then I know Target sold my data; I can burn the account by auto-spamming everything addressed to it, and move on.